Are you syncing in the relationship? Are you sinking in the relationship?
Unless you type it, actual tonality might not be conveyed well.
Syncing is a lovely word, I get it and that’s may be the most satisfying outcome. But somehow boring no – does it not mean that one or both loose individuality? However what about sinking? Why so much hate for that word?
Coming to think of it we always visualise water there and the inability of the sinker to be buoyant. Isn’t that the closeness of the mind of the recipient?
Why, always sinking should mean in plain or turbulent water? Why can’t it mean something else like a marsh where sinking is ugly and suffocating yet patterns on the dried out portions of the surface is something of a visual thing or a cloud where sinking is fast but beautiful cold and gravity is appreciated and god is remembered or a jiggly rubber where sinking is just temporary, or in a sponge where sinking is semi-problematic as you are not sinking actually but if you want to get out it is just difficult and you might need to roll instead of wasting your energy or say in non Newtonian fluid where you sink if you make movements and immediately start to surface if you lay still.
All I want to say is syncing or sinking are both 2 different concepts and are widely judged with harsh, judgemental and claustrophobic eyes and minds. And sinking in relationship might just be 1 such unexplored potential for the future sync-ability or un sync-ability.
What if they revolve around perpetually? syncing sometimes and sinking the other? What kind of a diagram will it convey at 2 dimension or higher? Will it not be fascinating to see such a dance of minds? And don’t you think if both would revolve around some center point which also be shifting with some angle or some inert force of buoyancy and what if that is also erratically beautiful? Who knows…
And mostly, you see what you seek. come on.. what if this is all flawed- shouldn’t one raise above stereotyping altogether?